Con Edison Delivery charges are outrageous. It is the main reason I considered running for office. As we all know, many times the delivery charges are 3 times the usage charge. Furthermore they are proposing a 13-18% increase. However, something also must be done regarding the amount NY brings in from property taxes they charge to ConEd.
Energy policy is directly tied to affordability and our environment, and the closing of Indian Point (Autopsy of a Perfect Policy Failure) is a perfect example of what happens when politics outweigh planning. Governor Cuomo and state and local Democrats, along with Riverkeeper, fought hard to shut down Indian Point without ever answering the most crucial yet basic questions — where will we get our energy, and what will it cost residents? That decision forced us to rely on a cable from Canada, eliminated over two thousand megawatts of clean, carbon-free energy, cost thousands of good-paying union jobs, and devastated the tax base of local communities.
I will strongly support policies that expand domestic energy production, including clean natural gas and carbon-free nuclear power. We need a balanced energy policy — not one driven by unrealistic mandates to eliminate fossil fuels within a decade. Those plans will only drive energy costs even higher, acting as a regressive tax and putting more strain on families already struggling to pay their bills.
I do not support going all-electric and I will oppose any county policies that do so. We don’t have the infrastructure to support it, and our electric bills are already too high. Governor Hochul’s All-Electric Buildings Act bans new gas hookups and fossil-fuel systems, raising serious concerns about affordability and grid reliability. Her entire climate iniative supported by the democrat majority of NY
I believe in smart solar — not mandates that destroy open spaces or wildlife. Let’s use building rooftops, parking lot canopies, and street-lights for solar instead. I do not support wind energy - the cost is not worth it, they harms wildlife and they leave behind non-recyclable waste.
We need balance, not mandates — an energy plan that’s practical, affordable, and sustainable.
NY once used our resources of endless timber, water, coal and oil to construct finished products for export worldwide, and provided enough power that New Yorkers had the cheapest electricity bills on the planet.
We now have foreign companies log our timber and ship it to China to make finished products they sell back to us, and make such little electricity, we have to pay the Canadians costly fees to sell us energy they make with the very ways we've banned here, delivered to New York households by a British for profit Corporation, National Grid, or Canadian owned Central Hudson.
Our politicians sold us out, and rank and file Democrats and Republicans in Albany let it happen.
I will introduce a bill to Congress banning foreign companies from having any part in our power grid.
With this, we will kick NYSEG, National Grid, and Central Hudson out of New York forever. They have lost the right to service New Yorkers through their massive exploitation and it is a national security risk to have foreign companies operating our utilities.
The bill will also require the New York Power Authority (NYPA) to retake full control of energy generation and delivery as these companies leave, and sell power directly to consumers at cost.
It will require New York to develop enough power to become self sufficient from other countries again, as currently New York has to buy energy from Canada, which produces that energy with the very means New York State has banned.
The Bill will require NYPA to become run by officials elected by New Yorkers, not appointed by Albany.
I’ll Secure federal matching funds for the reopening of Indian Point and construction of next-generation modular nuclear reactors, and new hydroelectric dams, and New York's own refineries, modernizing the energy grid to bring prices down to 1/10th of what they are now.
Our global rival China is building and opening hundreds of new nuclear power plants, hydropower dams, and oil fields, while we freeze ourselves with suicidal energy policies that are destroying us.
With this new model, New York can bring energy rates down from 20¢/kWh to 3¢/kWh—a move that would reignite manufacturing, lower housing costs, and make New York a magnet for investment again.
repeal Hochul's the All Electric Building Act
re-invest in nuclear power, natural gas, hydroelectric dams and NY's own refineries
no foreign countries can own our plants or delivery services or have any part of our power grid
get rid of National Grdi and Central Hudson
return money from NYSERDA to New Yorkers
smart solar only
no lithium battery plants along our waterways
MUST BE AN ELECTION YEAR!
“New York Governor Kathy Hochul Finally Admits Her Own Party's Green Dream Is Crushing Families
Even hardcore Democrats are waving the white flag on their climate fantasy. On March 20, 2026, Gov. Kathy Hochul stood at a gas pump—symbolism much?—and confessed that the 2019 Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act she once cheered is now too painful for "working families" to swallow.
The law's "noble" goals of cleaner air and lower emissions? Sure, she still loves them in theory. But reality hit hard: inflation, supply chain chaos, global energy mess, and skyrocketing utility bills that could add thousands of dollars a year to household costs.
Hochul's blunt take from the video: "If we stay on the current path without making adjustments, utility bills are going to go up thousands of dollars a year for the average household. Gas prices at the pump — we're already seeing increases, and these mandates could add another couple of dollars per gallon. That's not sustainable. That's not fair. We cannot leave working families behind in the name of environmental progress."
She even admitted the world "has changed dramatically since 2019" and that ramming through these mandates would "crush the people we're trying to help." So her big fix? Delay the mandates, push deadlines out (some to 2030 or beyond), and tweak the rules so New York doesn't look like a total failure on emissions.
This is peak liberal hypocrisy. Democrats rammed through aggressive green mandates when energy was cheap and voters weren't paying attention. Now, with families getting hammered at the pump and on their power bills, the same crowd that preached "the science is settled" suddenly needs "more time" and "realistic" tweaks. Hochul wants to protect the environment and affordability—she just realized you can't have both when your policies jack up costs by 20-30%.
The left's climate cult promised utopia. Instead, it delivered pain. Hochul's half-measure delay is just a Band-Aid on a self-inflicted wound. If the goals were truly noble, why wait until voters revolt to admit the timeline was delusional? New Yorkers deserve better than excuses from the party that sold them this mess. End the mandates, not just postpone the bill.”
MY OPPONENT DANA wrote this as an opinion piece:
New York’s nation-leading Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) set ambitious goals for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, starting with a 40% reduction by 2030. As we enter 2026, it can feel like 2030 is close. But as tempting as it may be for some to seek an extension on this deadline, we should not consider weakening this legislation. We must begin implementation of the primary policy vehicle that will drive reductions in carbon emissions – cap-and-invest – as soon as possible. For economic and environmental reasons, let’s move full speed ahead.
By making polluters pay for their emissions and investing the proceeds in initiatives that reduce emissions, cap-and-invest can put money into New Yorkers’ pockets – through targeted cash payments and incentives for taking actions that reduce emissions, and through the savings households can generate by taking those actions. Claims that implementing our climate law would make life less affordable for New Yorkers are not supported by the facts; they’re supported by propaganda, promoted by industries that are trying to cut their own costs at our expense. In truth, fossil fuels are what drive up costs, while clean energy and climate investments bring those costs down.
Thanks to technological advances and economies of scale, renewable energy is typically cheaper to build and operate than fossil fuels. Oil and gas price spikes are a major driver of inflation; when fossil fuel prices soar, the cost of doing business rises with them, which pushes up the cost of living. By contrast, clean energy is more stable, local and cost-effective. Our own Public Service Commission Chair Rory Christian recently noted that aging fossil fuel infrastructure, not the state’s climate law, is one of the biggest drivers of New York’s rising energy costs. As things currently stand, we are paying more and getting less. The climate crisis guarantees that pattern will worsen unless we act.
A state Supreme Court judge recently ruled that the Department of Environmental Conservation must issue the regulations to implement CLCPA mandates by Feb. 6. This should not be difficult; reporting from Politico confirms that the Department of Environmental Conservation and the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority already had draft cap-and-invest regulations ready at the beginning of last year. Further delay would harm every New Yorker and would not help families who are struggling with energy bills today. We would do better to help residents by implementing our climate law, as described above, in addition to passing other reforms that will be needed as time goes on, such as measures to make large tech companies pay their fair share for the energy they consume.
Legislators are entrusted to safeguard the health and well-being of our communities. Legislating a retreat from the CLCPA would do the opposite. It would deepen pollution and ensure that the costs of climate inaction continue to escalate. New Yorkers don’t have the luxury of waiting for climate action. We see the consequences of delay – and the costs those consequences bring with them – every year with increasing frequency: extreme heat, wildfire haze, flooded roads and rail lines, along with skyrocketing energy bills driven by our dependence on fossil fuels.
New York recognized the urgency of climate action in 2019, when we first passed the CLCPA. Ever since, fossil fuel interests have been trying to wear down our resolve to see our climate commitments through. We cannot give in to them.
Every New York State Senate Democrat voted against a proposal that would axe burdensome energy mandates, including repealing the All Electric Building Act, that have driven up housing costs. In effect, continuing to push homeownership out of reach for everyday New Yorkers.
My opponent, Dana Levenberg has sponsored legislation geared toward banning gasoline powered landscaping equipment.
NY A02114
Introduced Session
2025-2026 General Assembly
Bill Summary
AN ACT to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to prohibiting the sale of gasoline powered leaf blowers and lawn mowers
AI Summary
This bill aims to prohibit the sale of gasoline-powered leaf blowers and lawn mowers in the state of New York by January 1, 2027. Specifically, the bill requires the commissioner of environmental conservation to develop and implement rules and regulations that will effectively ban the retail sale of these gas-powered lawn care devices. The proposed legislation is part of a broader effort to reduce emissions from small gas-powered landscaping equipment, which are known to contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. By setting a clear deadline of January 1, 2027, the bill provides manufacturers, retailers, and consumers with a transition period to adapt to the new requirements, potentially encouraging the adoption of electric or battery-powered alternatives for lawn maintenance equipment. The bill would amend the state's environmental conservation law by adding a new section that mandates this sales prohibition, and it is set to take effect immediately upon passage.
Committee Categories
Agriculture and Natural Resources
Sponsors (3)
Robert Carroll (D)*, Dana Levenberg (D), Amy Paulin (D),
Last Action
referred to environmental conservation (on 01/07/2026)
Official Document
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A2114
also
https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/A4870/amendment/A
“Just when Hudson Valley ratepayers are recovering from another month of staggering utility bills, the State's energy authority has issued a warning that our current policies and mandates will add $4,100 to new costs while calling the full implementation infeasible.”
My opponent, Dana Levenberg, is the leading proponent for all of these current policies and mandates the State energy authority is warning us about.
She is the sponsor of current legislation to ban all gasoline powered landscaping equipment.
ICYMI: NYSERDA’s own memo raises serious red flags about CLCPA costs
A newly released NYSERDA memo outlining projected compliance costs under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA) confirms what many New Yorkers have been worried about: the price tag could be significant.
According to the memo, allowance prices could approach $179 per ton by 2031. That translates into estimated increases of:
• Up to $2.23 per gallon for gasoline
• About $16.96 per MMBtu for natural gas
• Comparable increases for diesel and other fuels
For moderate-income households, the projected annual impact is substantial. Families relying on heating oil or natural gas could see gross annual costs exceeding $4,000, even after accounting for certain offsets. Small and mid-sized businesses may also face steep utility increases, with some estimates suggesting costs could rise by as much as 46%.
New Yorkers deserve an honest conversation about affordability, grid reliability, and implementation timelines. Climate goals matter — but so do household budgets and economic competitiveness.
It’s time to take a hard look at the numbers, reassess near-term mandates where necessary, and pursue an energy strategy that protects both our environment and working families.